Exercise 2.1.1 Consider the following system, called a harmonic oscillator. The block has a mass and lies on a frictionless surface. The spring has a force constant . Write the Lagrangian and get the equation of motion.
Exercise 1.1.1 Verify these claims. For the first consider and use the advertised properties of the two null vectors in turn. For the second start with . For the third, begin with . For the last, let also satisfy . Since is unique, this means . Take it from here.
In everyday language, we often say things such as “this lamp is very bright,” “the desk is very bright,” or “the screen is very bright.”
However, in physics and lighting engineering, the word “bright” cannot be represented by just one quantity, because it may refer to different things:
| Concept | Symbol | Unit | What It Describes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luminous intensity | How strongly the source emits in a particular direction | ||
| Luminous flux | How much visible light is emitted in total | ||
| Illuminance | How much light reaches a surface | ||
| Luminous exitance | How much light a surface emits outward | ||
| Luminance | How bright a surface appears from a particular direction |
The calculus of variations may be said to have begun with Newton's problem of minimal resistance, proposed in 1687, followed by the brachistochrone problem proposed by Johann Bernoulli in 1696. The subject immediately attracted the attention of Jacob Bernoulli and Marquis de l'Hôpital, but it was Leonhard Euler who began to develop it systematically in 1733. Lagrange, influenced by Euler's work, made major contributions to the theory. After Euler saw the work published in 1755 by the nineteen-year-old Lagrange, he abandoned part of his own geometric approach in favor of Lagrange's purely analytic method and renamed the subject in his 1756 lectures Elementa Calculi Variationum.
Legendre proposed a method in 1786 for distinguishing maxima from minima, although it was not entirely satisfactory. Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz had also given some early attention to the subject. Other contributors included Vincenzo Brunacci (1810), Carl Friedrich Gauss (1829), Siméon Poisson (1831), Mikhail Ostrogradsky (1834), and Carl Jacobi (1837). An important work by Sarrus (1842) was simplified and improved by Cauchy (1844). Other significant papers and treatises include those of Strauch (1849), Jellett (1850), Otto Hesse (1857), Alfred Clebsch (1858), and Lewis Buffett Carll (1885), but perhaps the most important work of the century was that of Weierstrass. His celebrated course on the theory was epoch-making, and he may be regarded as the first person to place the calculus of variations on a firm and indisputable foundation. Hilbert's 20th and 23rd problems, published in 1900, further stimulated the development of the subject.
In the twentieth century, David Hilbert, Oskar Bolza, Gilbert Ames Bliss, Emmy Noether, Leonida Tonelli, Henri Lebesgue, and Jacques Hadamard all made important contributions to the calculus of variations. Marston Morse applied variational methods to what is now known as Morse theory. Lev Pontryagin, Ralph Rockafellar, and F. H. Clarke developed new mathematical tools in optimal control theory. Richard Bellman's dynamic programming provides an alternative approach to the calculus of variations.