2024-05-12
Algebra-I
00

Contents

§12.1 Simple Groups
§12.2 The Hölder Program
§12.3 Solvable Groups

**# §12 Simple Groups and the Hölder Program

§12.1 Simple Groups

Some groups cannot be built out of other groups. For example, what if HH admits no nontrivial normal subgroups? Then there can be no short exact sequence unless HKH\cong K or GHG\cong H. In this sense, groups with no nontrivial normal subgroups are the simplest groups.

Definition 12.1 A group HH is called a simple group if it has no nontrivial normal subgroups.

Example 12.1 A cyclic group is simple if and only if it is finite of prime order.

If it has prime order, then it is simple because it has no subgroups other than itself and 1{1}.

Conversely, a cyclic group of order nn has a subgroup for every number n/kn/k dividing nn; for example, given any generator xx, consider the set

{1,xk,}.\{1,x^{k},\ldots\}.

Therefore, a cyclic group is simple precisely when it has prime order.

Example 12.2 Z\mathbb{Z} is not simple.

It has many subgroups, and every subgroup of an Abelian group is normal.

Example 12.3 A1,A2,A3A_1,A_2,A_3 are simple.

A1A_1 and A2A_2 each have one element. By the First Isomorphism Theorem, A3A_3 is a subgroup of index 22 in S3S_3—it is a group of order 33, and hence a cyclic group of prime order.

Example 12.4 A4A_4 is not simple.

We need to find a nontrivial normal subgroup. The unique nontrivial normal subgroup of this group consists of elements that are products of two cycles. This normal subgroup is isomorphic to the Klein four group, while the quotient group is cyclic of order 33.

Theorem 12.1 For n5n\geqslant5, AnA_n is simple.

Proof: To prove that the alternating group AnA_n is simple for n5n\geqslant5, we must show that AnA_n has no normal subgroups other than the trivial subgroup e{e} and AnA_n itself.

Let NN be a normal subgroup of AnA_n with

N{e}.N\neq\{e\}.

We will prove that

N=An,N=A_n,

and hence that AnA_n is simple.

  1. NN contains a 33-cycle.

Since NN is nontrivial, there exists a nonidentity element

σN.\sigma\in N.

Consider the cycle types appearing in the disjoint-cycle decomposition of σ\sigma.

Case 1: If σ\sigma contains a 33-cycle, then NN contains a 33-cycle.

Case 2: If σ\sigma contains no 33-cycle, we will show in the following steps that NN nevertheless contains a 33-cycle.

  1. Conjugation and normality.

Since NN is normal in AnA_n, for every

τAn,\tau\in A_n,

we have

τστ1N.\tau\sigma\tau^{-1}\in N.

This property allows us to generate new elements of NN from elements already known to lie in NN.

  1. Producing 33-cycles.
  • Express elements as products of 33-cycles.

Every even permutation can be expressed as a product of 33-cycles. For example, a cycle of length k3k\geqslant3,

(a1a2ak),(a_1\,a_2\,\dots\,a_k),

can be written as

(a1a2a3)(a1a3a4)(a1ak1ak).(a_1\,a_2\,a_3) (a_1\,a_3\,a_4) \dots (a_1\,a_{k-1}\,a_k).
  • Use commutators to obtain a 33-cycle.

Consider σ\sigma and a suitable

τAn.\tau\in A_n.

The commutator

γ=στσ1τ1\gamma = \sigma\tau\sigma^{-1}\tau^{-1}

is an element of NN, because NN is normal, and it can be a 33-cycle.

  1. NN contains all 33-cycles.
  • Conjugacy classes.

In AnA_n, the 33-cycles split into two conjugacy classes, but their union is the set of all 33-cycles.

Since NN contains at least one 33-cycle and is normal, it must contain every 33-cycle in the corresponding conjugacy class.

  • AnA_n is generated by 33-cycles.

For

n5,n\geqslant5,

the group AnA_n is generated by its 33-cycles.

Therefore, the subgroup of AnA_n generated by all 33-cycles is AnA_n itself.

  1. Conclusion.

Since NN contains all 33-cycles, NN generates AnA_n. Hence

N=An.N=A_n.

Therefore, for

n5,n\geqslant5,

AnA_n is simple.

 ~\tag*{$\square$}

§12.2 The Hölder Program

Now that we have seen many examples of groups, we would like to begin classifying them.

Can we come up with a general strategy that would allow us to say:

“I know all groups”?

Question: How do we classify all groups?

In some sense, this question has no satisfactory answer.

We can try to understand all simple groups, and then understand all the ways in which they can be assembled.

The strategy that began in the nineteenth century is called the Hölder program.

It looks very natural.

The problem is that we do not know how to carry it out.

We cannot even classify all simple groups.

Can we at least understand all finite simple groups and their extensions?

That would classify all finite groups.

We still do not know how to do this.

By around 1985, we were able to classify all finite simple groups, but we still do not know how to solve the problem of classifying their extensions.

To give you some sense of how difficult the classification problem is, consider the following theorem, which helped earn Thompson a Fields Medal:

Theorem 12.2 (Feit-Thompson Theorem, or Odd Order Theorem)

Every finite non-Abelian simple group has even order.

Thus, for example, if you give me a non-Abelian group of odd order, I immediately know that it is not simple.

Definition 12.2 The Hölder program for classifying groups is:

(1) Classify all simple groups.

(2) Classify all ways of constructing extensions of simple groups.

We do not know how to complete this program.

For example, we do not know how to carry out Step (1) in general.

We only know how to classify finite simple groups, and this classification was not completed until around 1985.

Even for finite groups, we have not completed Step (2).

§12.3 Solvable Groups

Following the Hölder program's emphasis on understanding and decomposing complicated group structures, we now study solvable groups, which can be systematically decomposed into simpler Abelian components.

Definition 12.3 A group GG is called solvable if it has a finite sequence of subgroups

G=G0G1G2Gn={e}G=G_{0}\triangleright G_{1}\triangleright G_{2}\triangleright\cdots\triangleright G_{n}=\{e\}

such that each GiG_i is normal in Gi1G_{i-1} and the corresponding quotient group

Gi1/GG_{i-1}/G

is Abelian.

Remark A group is called “solvable” because it can be decomposed into smaller and simpler pieces, eventually reaching the trivial group.

Example 12.5 Every cyclic group is Abelian, and therefore it is trivially solvable.

Example 12.6

S3S_3 is solvable.

A normal series is

S3A3{e}.S_3\triangleright A_3\triangleright\{e\}.

The quotient groups are

S3/A3Z/2Z,S_3/A_3 \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z},

and

A3/{e}Z/3Z.A_3/\{e\} \cong \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}.

Both are Abelian, so S3S_3 is solvable.

Example 12.7 S5S_5 is not solvable.

The absence of a suitable normal series highlights the difference between solvable groups and more complicated groups.

Proposition 12.3 Every subgroup of a solvable group is solvable.

Proof: A solvable group GG has a chain of subgroups

G=G0G1Gn={e},G=G_{0} \triangleright G_{1} \triangleright \dots \triangleright G_{n} = \{e\},

where each quotient group

Gi1/GiG_{i-1}/G_i

is Abelian.

Let

HGH\subseteq G

be a subgroup.

We may intersect HH with each group in the chain:

HG0HG1HGn={e}.H\cap G_{0} \triangleright H\cap G_{1} \triangleright \dots \triangleright H\cap G_{n} = \{e\}.

Each quotient group

(HGi1)/(HGi)(H\cap G_{i-1})/(H\cap G_i)

is a subgroup of the Abelian quotient group

Gi1/Gi,G_{i-1}/G_i,

and is therefore itself Abelian.

Thus we obtain a normal series for HH whose quotient groups are Abelian.

Therefore,

HH

is solvable.

 ~\tag*{$\square$}

Proposition 12.4 A quotient group of a solvable group is solvable.

Proof: Suppose GG is solvable.

Then it has a chain of normal subgroups

G=G0G1Gn={e},G=G_{0} \triangleright G_{1} \triangleright \dots \triangleright G_{n} = \{e\},

where each quotient

Gi1/GiG_{i-1}/G_i

is Abelian.

Let

NGN\triangleleft G

be a normal subgroup. We want to prove that

G/NG/N

is solvable.

Use the series in GG to form a new series in the quotient:

G0/NG1/NGn/N={e}.G_{0}/N \triangleright G_{1}/N \triangleright \dots \triangleright G_{n}/N = \{e\}.

Each new quotient

(Gi1/N)/(Gi/N)Gi1/Gi(G_{i-1}/N)/(G_i/N) \cong G_{i-1}/G_i

is Abelian because the original quotient

Gi1/GiG_{i-1}/G_i

is Abelian.

Therefore,

G/NG/N

is solvable.

 ~\tag*{$\square$}

Our discussion of solvable groups illustrates how groups can be decomposed into simpler components.

Although solvable groups have a clear and manageable structure, the study of nonsolvable groups, such as simple groups, remains essential for understanding the broader landscape of group theory.

In the next chapter, we will continue to explore more specialized results in group theory, such as the Sylow theorems, which provide deeper insight into the structure of finite groups. **